‘Algebra Programming’™

Algebra - The most Powerful 'Programming' Language on the Planet

Programming changes at pace, around our world. It is essential to keep up with it. It can be difficult to keep with up it, especially when you have great programming ideas, and yet no specialist ability in a given programming language. The one, universal programming language we all learnt at school was mathematics, best summarised as algebra.

Algebra also summarises all programming languages. They are essentially what we called, in primary school, 'word equations'. Naturally, word equations are representations of algebraic expressions, where characters are substituted for words or abbreviated words.

On that basis, it should make sense that those who are powerful in their ability in the world's oldest and most easily translatable programming language, algebra, should see an extremely profitable future, as long as they assert their value as genuine programming. That is to derivative level or conventional programmers via the product sponsors or product managers.

The programmers form the base of the commercial value tree. The traditional programmers, then form successive branches - eg:  algebra, C, C++, C# and algebra, C, python.

Being at the age of the value tree/chain, those who excel in their specialisation of algebra programming, will earn more than all other developers on the planet. An explosion of new purely algebraic programmers is expected to shake the IT (Information Technology) industry. While IT is information technology, mathematics is Information Science. It Pre-empts the application in IT or applied mathematics.

Mathematics is Information Science.

Appendix

A pivotal insight is that programming in proper fractions is significantly superior to programming in decimal fractions. Decimal fractions need to be patched to keep up with operating system, precision changes. Proper fractions will simply automatically update without patching or further updates. Eg. '1/3' is programmed once only to achieve it value.

For a precision of 10 ^ -3 the decimal entry would be 0.333. for a precision increase to 10 ^ -9, the program would require a patch to enter the new value of 0.333333333 etc. 1/3 is the easier solution to work with for that example.

© Xerqon Pty Ltd 2025