BODMAS to BEDMAS Sequencing Law

Updated: 4 days ago

The terms of the article, From Static BODMAS to BODMAS Sequencing is free access. No fee is due for access to the article.

BEDMAS Sequential Rule

(1) A = pow (( pow (x , 2)) , 1/2)

(2) A = pow ((x , 2) , 1/2)

(3) A = -x , x

(3) would be conventionally considered the correct answer to (1), (2).

Can there be a set of different, genuine answers, and can they be analysed to ascertain which is the accurate and completely precise?

From (1) A = pow (4 , 1/2)

BODMAS commands us to first work in the brackets:

pow (4 , 1/2) = -2 , 2

The next step that we are supposed to follow is work with the power, since the is no presentation of of or division.

Higher order multiplication are powers:

Pow (( -2, 2 ) , 2 ) = 4 , 4

From (2) A = pow (x , 2)

BODMAS commands us to first work in the brackets:

pow ( x , 2) = 4

The next step in the available sequence selection is higher order multiplication (powers):

pow ((4 , 1/2) , 2 ) = 4

Exponent or Power Series

pow ( ( (x , a) , b ) , c ) , d )

= x ^ a ^ b ^ c ^ d

Recent Posts